Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.
Identifieur interne : 000198 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000197; suivant : 000199Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.
Auteurs : Simon N. Williams [Royaume-Uni, États-Unis] ; Christopher J. Armitage [Royaume-Uni] ; Tova Tampe [Suisse] ; Kimberly Dienes [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy [ 1369-7625 ] ; 2021.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, one of the key components of many countries' strategies to reduce the spread of the virus is contact tracing.
OBJECTIVE
To explore public attitudes to a COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom.
SETTING
Online video-conferencing.
PARTICIPANTS
27 participants, UK residents aged 18 years and older.
METHODS
Qualitative study consisting of six focus groups carried out between 1st-12th May, 2020 (39-50 days into the UK 'lockdown').
RESULTS
Participants were divided as to whether or not they felt they would use the app. Analysis revealed five themes: (1) lack of information and misconceptions surrounding COVID-19 contact tracing apps; (2) concerns over privacy; (3) concerns over stigma; (4)concerns over uptake; and (5) contact tracing as the 'greater good'. Concerns over privacy, uptake and stigma were particularly significant amongst those stated they will not be using the app, and the view that the app is for the 'greater good' was particularly significant amongst those who stated they will be using the app. One of the most common misconceptions about the app was that it could allow users to specifically identify and map COVID-19 cases amongst their contacts and in their vicinity.
CONCLUSIONS
Our participants were torn over whether digital contact tracing is a good idea or not, and views were heavily influenced by moral reasoning.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
No patients were involved in this study. The public were not involved in the development of the research questions, research design or outcome measures. A pilot focus group with participants not included in the present paper was used to help test and refine the focus group questions. Summary results were disseminated via email to participants prior to publication for feedback and comment.
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13179
PubMed: 33434404
Affiliations:
- Royaume-Uni, Suisse, États-Unis
- Angleterre, Grand Manchester, Illinois
- Manchester
- Université de Manchester
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.</title><author><name sortKey="Williams, Simon N" sort="Williams, Simon N" uniqKey="Williams S" first="Simon N" last="Williams">Simon N. Williams</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Swansea</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Illinois</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Armitage, Christopher J" sort="Armitage, Christopher J" uniqKey="Armitage C" first="Christopher J" last="Armitage">Christopher J. Armitage</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tampe, Tova" sort="Tampe, Tova" uniqKey="Tampe T" first="Tova" last="Tampe">Tova Tampe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country><wicri:regionArea>World Health Organization, Geneva</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Geneva</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dienes, Kimberly" sort="Dienes, Kimberly" uniqKey="Dienes K" first="Kimberly" last="Dienes">Kimberly Dienes</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2021">2021</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33434404</idno><idno type="pmid">33434404</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/hex.13179</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000282</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000282</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000282</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000282</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000282</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.</title><author><name sortKey="Williams, Simon N" sort="Williams, Simon N" uniqKey="Williams S" first="Simon N" last="Williams">Simon N. Williams</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Swansea</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Illinois</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Armitage, Christopher J" sort="Armitage, Christopher J" uniqKey="Armitage C" first="Christopher J" last="Armitage">Christopher J. Armitage</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tampe, Tova" sort="Tampe, Tova" uniqKey="Tampe T" first="Tova" last="Tampe">Tova Tampe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suisse</country><wicri:regionArea>World Health Organization, Geneva</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Geneva</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dienes, Kimberly" sort="Dienes, Kimberly" uniqKey="Dienes K" first="Kimberly" last="Dienes">Kimberly Dienes</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Manchester</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</title><idno type="eISSN">1369-7625</idno><imprint><date when="2021" type="published">2021</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, one of the key components of many countries' strategies to reduce the spread of the virus is contact tracing.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>To explore public attitudes to a COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>SETTING</b></p><p>Online video-conferencing.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>PARTICIPANTS</b></p><p>27 participants, UK residents aged 18 years and older.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Qualitative study consisting of six focus groups carried out between 1st-12th May, 2020 (39-50 days into the UK 'lockdown').</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Participants were divided as to whether or not they felt they would use the app. Analysis revealed five themes: (1) lack of information and misconceptions surrounding COVID-19 contact tracing apps; (2) concerns over privacy; (3) concerns over stigma; (4)concerns over uptake; and (5) contact tracing as the 'greater good'. Concerns over privacy, uptake and stigma were particularly significant amongst those stated they will not be using the app, and the view that the app is for the 'greater good' was particularly significant amongst those who stated they will be using the app. One of the most common misconceptions about the app was that it could allow users to specifically identify and map COVID-19 cases amongst their contacts and in their vicinity.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Our participants were torn over whether digital contact tracing is a good idea or not, and views were heavily influenced by moral reasoning.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION</b></p><p>No patients were involved in this study. The public were not involved in the development of the research questions, research design or outcome measures. A pilot focus group with participants not included in the present paper was used to help test and refine the focus group questions. Summary results were disseminated via email to participants prior to publication for feedback and comment.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33434404</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>12</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1369-7625</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><PubDate><Year>2021</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>12</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Health Expect</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/hex.13179</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, one of the key components of many countries' strategies to reduce the spread of the virus is contact tracing.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To explore public attitudes to a COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Online video-conferencing.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PARTICIPANTS" NlmCategory="METHODS">27 participants, UK residents aged 18 years and older.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Qualitative study consisting of six focus groups carried out between 1st-12th May, 2020 (39-50 days into the UK 'lockdown').</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Participants were divided as to whether or not they felt they would use the app. Analysis revealed five themes: (1) lack of information and misconceptions surrounding COVID-19 contact tracing apps; (2) concerns over privacy; (3) concerns over stigma; (4)concerns over uptake; and (5) contact tracing as the 'greater good'. Concerns over privacy, uptake and stigma were particularly significant amongst those stated they will not be using the app, and the view that the app is for the 'greater good' was particularly significant amongst those who stated they will be using the app. One of the most common misconceptions about the app was that it could allow users to specifically identify and map COVID-19 cases amongst their contacts and in their vicinity.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Our participants were torn over whether digital contact tracing is a good idea or not, and views were heavily influenced by moral reasoning.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION" NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">No patients were involved in this study. The public were not involved in the development of the research questions, research design or outcome measures. A pilot focus group with participants not included in the present paper was used to help test and refine the focus group questions. Summary results were disseminated via email to participants prior to publication for feedback and comment.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2020 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Williams</LastName><ForeName>Simon N</ForeName><Initials>SN</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2854-9946</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Armitage</LastName><ForeName>Christopher J</ForeName><Initials>CJ</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-1765</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tampe</LastName><ForeName>Tova</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-9220</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dienes</LastName><ForeName>Kimberly</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-7025</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><Agency>University of Manchester's Health Psychology Section</Agency><Country></Country></Grant><Grant><Agency>Swansea University's 'Greatest Need' fund</Agency><Country></Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>12</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Health Expect</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9815926</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1369-6513</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">COVID-19</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">contact tracing</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">public attitudes</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">public health</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2020</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>17</Hour><Minute>33</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33434404</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/hex.13179</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Title>REFERENCES</Title><Reference><Citation>European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 situation update worldwide, as of 7th May 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases. Accessed September 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>National Health Service (NHS) UK. Advice for everyone: Coronavirus (COVID-19). https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/. Accessed September 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fernandes N.Economic impacts of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the word economy. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3557504. Accessed May 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Williams S, Armitage C, Tampe T, Dienes K. Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e039334. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>World Health Organization. Contact Tracing (website). https://www.who.int/csr/disease/ebola/training/contact-tracing/en/. Accessed June 30, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wong J, Leo Y, Tan C. COVID-19 in Singapore: current experience. JAMA. 2020;323:1243-1244.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Keeling M, Hollingsworth D, Read J. The Efficacy of Contact Tracing for the Containment of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) MedRxiv 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/02/17/2020.02.14.20023036.full.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2020.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Department of Health and Social Care (UK). Health and Social Care Secretary's statement on coronavirus (COVID-19): 1 May 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/health-and-social-care-secretarys-statement-on-coronavirus-covid-19-1-may-2020. Accessed June 30, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ferretti L, Wymant C, Kendall M, et al. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science. 368:eabb6936.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Public Health England. Letter to Directors of Public Health about contact tracing (1st May) 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882950/RGleave_letter_to_DSPH2.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hern A, Proctor K.UK may ditch NHS contact-tracing app for Apple and Google model. The Guardian. 7th May 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/07/uk-may-ditch-nhs-contact-tracing-app-for-apple-and-google-model. Accessed May 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Department of Health and Social Care, UK. Coronavirus test, track and trace plan launched on Isle of Wight. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/coronavirus-test-track-and-trace-plan-launched-on-isle-of-wight. Accessed June 30, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Timeline: The NHS Track and Trace App. ITV News 19th June 2020. https://www.itv.com/news/2020-06-19/timeline-the-nhs-test-and-trace-app/. Accessed June 30, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Geldsetzer P. Knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 among the general public in the United States and the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional online survey. Annal Intern Med. 2020;173(2):157-160. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-0912</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Altmann S, Milsom L, Zillessen H, Blasone R, Gerdon F, et al. Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey evidence. MedRxiv 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091587</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Milsom L, Abeler J, Altmann S, Toussaert S, Zillessen H, et al.Survey of acceptability of app-based contact tracing in the UK, US, France, Germany and Italy; 2020. https://osf.io/7vgq9/. Accessed May 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaughan A.There are many reasons why covid-19 contact-tracing apps may not work. New Scientist 2020. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2241041-there-are-many-reasons-why-covid-19-contact-tracing-apps-may-not-work/. Accessed May 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tates K, Zwaanswijk M, Otten R, et al. Online focus groups as a tool to collect data from hard-to-include populations: examples from pediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Method. 2009;9:ar15.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Williams S. A 21st century Citizens’ POLIS: Introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making’. Public Underst Sci. 2010;19:528-544.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coffey A., Atkinson P. Making Sense of Qualitative Data. London: Sage; 1996.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 1997.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mays N, Pope C. Rigor and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995;311:109-112.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 1977. New York: Random House; 1977.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lyon D. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lupon D. M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory Health. 2012;10:229-244.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Rajczi A. Liberalism and public health. Bioethics. 2015;30:96-108.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pope T. Balancing public health against individual liberty: the ethics of smoking regulation. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev. 2000;61:419-498.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>van der Eijk Y. Ethics of tobacco harm reduction from a liberal perspective. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:273-277.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Goiana-da-Silva F, Cruz-e-Silva D, Bartlett O, et al. The ethics of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages to improve public health. Front Public Health. 2020;8:ar 110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00110</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Holland S. Public Health Ethics. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mill JS. On Liberty. Boston: Ticknor and Fields; 1863.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Thompson A, Robertson A, Upshur R. Public health ethics: Towards a research agenda. Acta Bioethica. 2003;9:157-163.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Jones T. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Acad Manag Rev. 1991;16:336-395.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>NHS UK. People at higher risk from coronavirus (website); 2020. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/people-at-higher-risk-from-coronavirus/. Accessed May 14, 2020.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>We thank an anonymous reviewer for this argument. For a discussion of the issues and challenges involved in recruiting participants from ‘vulnerable’ groups, see: Ellard-Gray A, Jeffrey NK, Choubak M, Crann S. Finding the Hidden Participant: Solutions for Recruiting Hidden, Hard-to-Reach, and Vulnerable Populations. Int J Qual Methods. 2015; 14: 1-10.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>NHS UK. Mental wellbeing while staying at home; 2020. https://www.nhs.uk/oneyou/every-mind-matters/coronavirus-covid-19-staying-at-home-tips/. Accessed May 14, 2020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Yach D, Bettcher D. The globalization of public health, II: the convergence of self-interest and altruism. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:783-744.</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li><li>Suisse</li><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li><li>Grand Manchester</li><li>Illinois</li></region><settlement><li>Manchester</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Manchester</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Williams, Simon N" sort="Williams, Simon N" uniqKey="Williams S" first="Simon N" last="Williams">Simon N. Williams</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Armitage, Christopher J" sort="Armitage, Christopher J" uniqKey="Armitage C" first="Christopher J" last="Armitage">Christopher J. Armitage</name><name sortKey="Armitage, Christopher J" sort="Armitage, Christopher J" uniqKey="Armitage C" first="Christopher J" last="Armitage">Christopher J. Armitage</name><name sortKey="Dienes, Kimberly" sort="Dienes, Kimberly" uniqKey="Dienes K" first="Kimberly" last="Dienes">Kimberly Dienes</name></country><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Illinois"><name sortKey="Williams, Simon N" sort="Williams, Simon N" uniqKey="Williams S" first="Simon N" last="Williams">Simon N. Williams</name></region></country><country name="Suisse"><noRegion><name sortKey="Tampe, Tova" sort="Tampe, Tova" uniqKey="Tampe T" first="Tova" last="Tampe">Tova Tampe</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/LockdownV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000198 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000198 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= LockdownV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33434404
|texte= Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33434404" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LockdownV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |